That last part might not appeal much to Battlefield fans, not after Battlefield 5 failed to introduce battle royale to the series with its Firestorm mode. Numerous issues, including a slow pace and a bad loot system, resulted in Firestorm being largely dismissed as one of the worst battle royale games out there. Of course, with battle royale being much more prominent now than when BF5 first dropped, there’s always hope that DICE has taken Firestorm’s failure to heart and is focusing more on improving Battlefield ’s battle royale experie

Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4 were both based on modern combat , and saw the greatest commercial success prior to the best-selling Battlefield 1 . Plus, modern military has actually advanced incredibly since 2014 with higher usage of drones and autonomous ordnance, so there’s plenty of new material for Battlefield 6 to expl

It’s a bit of an abstract concept, but Battlefield has consistently focused on a strictly historical/realistic perspective in its most recent iterations. That alone isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it does make for a less creative or unique identity for Battlefield . At least in terms of gaming, it very quickly becomes just another game about the horrors of war, and less about people playing this game for entertainment. Future Battlefield games don’t need to necessarily go crazy and be super campy like Bad Company , but for https://Battlefield2042Hq.com/ lack of a better expression, Battlefield shouldn’t take itself too seriously. War is scary, but Battlefield should be fun first and forem

Battlefield has had an issue in the past with destruction not having any recognizable impact on gameplay. Previous titles like Battlefield: Bad Company 2 used to integrate the capability of destruction into its level design, which is partially what made Bad Company 2 one of the best games in the whole series. Games like Battlefield 3 onward tried to replicate the importance of destruction in different ways, but the “Levolution” mechanics ended up being lackluster in comparison. Alternatively, a higher player density in multiplayer games could make games like Conquest a bit more strategic with squad placements. Any capability to add more players on screen/in the lobby is perfect for Battlefield , which thrives on simulating large-scale warf

Of course, this brings into question what time period Battlefield 6 could take place in. It’s very possible the series could return to contemporary warfare, similar to many entries before. Or the franchise could pull another Battlefield 1 and pick a time of war that games have rarely portrayed. There’s a few options for Battlefield 6 in terms of a time period or setting, ranging from the most likely to most improba

Battlefield 5 , the most recent release in the Battlefield franchise, is ending support this June, with Battlefield 6 confirmed to be on the way. Both Call of Duty and Battlefield have recently revisited World War 2 as a return to each franchise’s roots. Now it seems Call of Duty ‘s annual releases are shifting back to modern and futuristic battlefields. Either EA’s first-person shooter will follow suit, or the franchise could once again carve its own p

One thing in particular that newer Battlefield titles seem to gloss over is the potential in functionally destructible environments . Sure, every Battlefield game since Bad Company has featured highly destructible environments, but never as functionally important as the first few iterations. Destruction quickly became a defining difference between Battlefield and Call of Duty , but future iterations have subdued the importance of destruction. Earlier titles like Battlefield 1942 and Battlefield 2 featured destruction in a limited form, only allowing for certain geometry (like bridges) to be destroyed while the rest of the landscape remained unchanged. With the advent of the Frostbite engine, Battlefield games were able to craft near-fully destructible environments for all geometry and not just certain obje

In terms of what was specifically shown, the gameplay from DICE is very ambiguous. It’s clearly an early prototype of gameplay for the next Battlefield game, but the assets themselves don’t appear to be any different from Battlefield 5 . It’s very possible the prototype gameplay shown was a repurposing of assets from Battlefield 5 showcasing what next-gen processing is capable of. That being said, it shows about around a hundred of what appear to be rendered models (all potentially players) moving in a single space. There also was a scene showing a building collapsing, which was more than likely showcasing a new version of Battlefield ‘s Destruction physics. Lastly, there were a few close-ups of an indistinct soldier’s face rendered in high detail, though it wasn’t clear if this was next-gen graphics rendered in-eng

During EA Play’s 2020 Live showcase, there was an interesting tidbit shared at the end of the show from chief studios officer Laura Miele. Towards the end of the showcase, EA showed off some very early next-gen development footage from EA’s first-party development studios like BioWare, Criterion, and DICE. “Our studios are taking their crazy, ambitious ideas and making them real,” stated Miele. “Every console generation DICE sets the bar for excellence in audio and visual presentation. We are creating epic battles at a scale and fidelity unlike anything you’ve experienced before.” This is almost certainly in reference to Battlefield 6 , or whatever Battlefield title is currently in the works for 2